Audience feedback

Question 1:
Out of the ten people we asked who had watched our blog seven of them agreed that the framing was good and the inter cutting was good on most scenes but we could have improved on some interviews and on some of the cutaways, 2 of the people asked said that the framing was average at best and could have been improved greatly while the last person though that both the framing and cutaways was incredibly poor.

Question 2:
out of the ten people we asked eight of them said the music suited the documentary perfectly, as it added an eerie feeling which they though was perfect for a documentary about phobias, however they agreed the music should have been a little bit louder as it was hard to hear on some parts of the documentary, the remaining two thought the music chosen wasn't bad but it could have been something better.

Question 3:
Out of the ten people asked five of them all said the editing wasn't bad, as they didn't see any jumps in the interviews and most of it seemed to flow, three of them answered with the editing was poor and cutaways poorly placed and didn't see the relevance of half the things in the documentary and that it hardly flowed, the remaining two stated that the editing was of a very good quality and liked how no jumps were seen in the interviews and both agreed it flowed well.

Question 4:
Out of the ten people asked six of them agreed that they found the documentary interesting and felt they had learnt something new after watching it, the other four had put no.

Question 5:
Out of the ten people asked four of them had put 5/10, one of them had put 6/10, three of them had put 7/10 and two of them had put 4/10.

Question 6:
Out of the ten people asked three of them had put that the Blue screen was out weakest element, five of them had put cutaways and two of them had put Music.

Question 7:
Out of the ten people asked four of them had put that interviews was the strongest element of our documentary, three of them put music, one of them had put blue screen and the last one had put titles.

Question 8:
Out of the ten people asked eight of them had put yes it does relate to the documentary and the other two had put no.

Question 9:
Out of the ten people asked seven of them had put that the poster does relate to the documentary and the other three had put no.

Question 10:
Out of the ten people asked six of them said the voice didn't engage them in the adverts or the documentary as it wasn't very audible and would have preferred if it was of a better audio quality, the other four said they enjoyed the voice over but would have liked it to have been in the documentary a bit more.